|
National Security (2003)
IMDB rating: 4.70
Plot: Earl and Hank have only one thing in common: they’re both L.A.P.D. rejects. One just got kicked out, the other can’t even get in. After confronting each other on opposite sides of the law during a traffic stop that escalates out of control, these two luckless individuals end up partnered as lowly security guards. Despite being damned to the lowest rung of the law enforcement ladder, Earl and Hank uncover a sophisticated smuggling operation led by Nash and his band of thugs. When Earl and Hank get their hands on some hot property, they go on the run from, first the bad guys, then the L.A.P.D.—led by Lt. Washington and Detective McDuff. What these two unlikely partners do to law enforcement is a crime, but they just might save the day. That is, if they don’t kill each other first.
|
Directors: Dugan Dennis
Actors: Lawrence Martin,Zahn Steve,Feore Colm,Duke Bill,Roberts Eric,Busfield Timothy,McCoy Matt,Cullen Brett,Del Sol Gerry,Lerner Ken,Tobolowsky Stephen,Flaherty Joe,Thriller,Comedy,Crime,Action,
How have changes to immigration law improved national security in the US?
We read and hear about national security constantly. Lawmakers are interested in changing immigration law. How do you feel changes to immigration law can improve our national security? Are national security and immigration law linked together? What specific changes do you feel can be made in order to ensure US safety and security? Presentation on Monday. Your thoughts would be appreciated. Thank you!
They have not and they will not.
An immigrant is here to make a better life for himself, or because of family. The pose no threat, never did, never will.
A terrorist is here to wreck havoc, they are not concerned with immigration laws, they would not bother with such nonsense. They would come here like they did before AS TOURISTS. There is no need to attempt to cross the border illegally, they can get detected and deported or they could die in the process of entering the country, that would be an idiotic waste of resources for the terrorist organization. However, as a tourist all they have to do is come in disguised among 61 million tourist a year, a much better, cheaper and easier route.
Nobody checks tourists nor should they and there are tens of millions of them. Thousands of guards patrol the border and there are only about 300,000 trying to enter the country a year, which route would you take?
No changes on immigration law or policy will or should affect US national security.
Eli | Sep 14, 2006
the bill in the house ,,,,or the presidents, and the senate bill,,,, has either one passed both houses yet,,,, on immigration reform…..I think the law is still being debated,,, in the meantime,, we have immigration laws,, but the justice department and Alberto Gonzales,, along with George W Bush have made a mockery of our nations laws,,,,,,,,,,,
Neddie | Sep 14, 2006
HR 6061 passed by congress today. Now it goes to the Senate. It asks for 2 tiered fence along the boarder. Its an emergency measure that would help take the necessary steps to address the crossing of our boarders. If it passes in the Senate, President Bush would sign it, or not. Depending on his mood for the day. Lets keep our fingers crossed, at least its a step in the right direction!
image7070 | Sep 14, 2006
We need more than just border security, we need true enforcement and visa/employment tracking within the country to keep tabs on people. The illegals amongst the 9/11 plane crew overstayed visas, and police who stopped 4 of them for tickets after their visas expired never asked for the visas or regarding immigration status. Local law enforcement not only needs leeway to enforce, but restrictions against declaring sanctuary.
I’ll get back to this. It deserves a thoughtful response.
DAR | Sep 14, 2006
seriously, it isn’t about national security is all about being able to control every aspect of the average everyday life. Next thing, everyone will have chips with all their info, DOB, SS#, meds, allergies, DL#, bank accounts, swipe your hand and they will own you. That’s where is heading
Letty | Sep 14, 2006
I think they are linked. We live in a Changed World, and foisting off your poor on some other country has been the ‘easy out’ for countries like Cuba and Mexico for years. That ‘easy out’ has prevented them from evolving nationally to the point where they can support all their people.
The May-Day mexican ‘parade’ basically illustrated for all and sundry that we’ve got a lot of mexican citizens that’ve taken up residence in our country, but still basically hold allegiance to Mexico. Ironically, the illegal immigrants themselves have made the strongest possible case for improving immigration enforcement. If ya wanna be an american citizen, fine, but do it the right way, do it the legal way, and leave all that other stuff behind, or don’t bother. 50 states, no more no less, other countries need to work a lot harder to fix their own problems,
and we need to enforce our border laws, simple as that.
gokart121 | Sep 14, 2006
?